Research Parameter Golf

Notebook

Parameter Golf — Run Leaderboard

The live leaderboard of Parameter Golf training runs: every experiment's quantized validation BPB, synced back from remote GPU machines.

Verdict Not applicable

Published
Jul 2026
Verdict
Not applicable
Source commit
48faedeea7fe…
Verification
Verified
Question
Which tiny-language experiments actually improved compression under the sealed leaderboard?
Intent
Make progress legible as comparable runs, not isolated anecdotes.
Method
Load the sealed results snapshot, rank eligible runs, and separate smoke/null rows from promoted entries.
Next test
Add a fresh held-out family before treating the current leader as a general technique.

Parameter Golf — Run Leaderboard

Question

Which Parameter Golf runs currently lead on quantized validation bits-per-byte, and what lineage moved the needle from the ROCm baseline?

Context

Live board for Parameter Golf. Quantized validation BPB is the number that survives deployment-style quantization — the competition-relevant meter. Float BPB sits beside it for diagnosis.

Research framing from the timing literature (prioritization research):

  • The board is a lineage tracker, not a controlled A/B table — step counts, wallclock caps, and parent deltas differ by run.
  • Early-signal promotions (partial RoPE, XSA, EMA, capacity) should appear as parent→child improvements; late-signal bets need longer runs before the board can judge them.
  • Smoke runners without quantized BPB stay unranked so null metrics do not pollute the leader.

Findings

The sealed notebooks/public/results.json snapshot holds eight rows; six are ranked training runs and two are one-step smoke runners without quantized BPB.

  • ROCm-patched baseline: 2.067 quantized val BPB after 251 steps under a 600-second wallclock cap on one MI300X (17.1M parameters).
  • Current leader exp004_partial_rope_promo: 1.295 quantized val BPB over 2,463 steps at the same 17.1M budget.
  • Between them: exp004 clean (1.403), exp001 with 11 layers + 3×MLP at 26.5M (1.431), exp003 EMA (1.491), exp002 XSA-4 (1.514).

Step counts and budgets differ. Each run’s change field records what moved relative to its parent.

Method

Scans synced result.json artifacts from RunPod / MI300X experiments (local checkout) or the sealed notebooks/public/results.json bundle (published WASM). Renders experiment lineage, parent delta, quantized and float validation bits-per-byte, step time, and parameter count. Null-BPB smoke runs are listed separately from the ranked board.

Limits

  • Not a factorial experiment: different step budgets and parents mean deltas are historical, not causal estimates.
  • Sealed public snapshot may lag the newest remote runs/**/result.json until the bundle is refreshed and rehashed.
  • Leaderboard BPB numbers are not interchangeable with Technique Explorer timing anecdotes without matching train configs.

Artifact

Fully interactive: the published notebook runs Python in the browser via WebAssembly, rendering the sealed notebooks/public/results.json bundle pinned at the source commit. Local checkouts scan runs/**/result.json instead, so the same notebook serves both surfaces.

Open notebook View source ↗

  • training
  • language-models
  • marimo