Research Parameter Golf

Notebook

Parameter Golf — Technique Explorer

An interactive catalog of training techniques for small language models, filterable by how early each one shows measurable signal.

Verdict Not applicable

Published
Jul 2026
Verdict
Not applicable
Source commit
48faedeea7fe…
Verification
Verified
Question
Which signal-timing ideas are worth trying before spending more golf budget?
Intent
Turn scattered compression tricks into a budget-aware technique catalog.
Method
Organize sealed Parameter Golf runs by mechanism, cost, and observed leaderboard effect.
Next test
Promote only techniques that improve a fresh leaderboard run under the same null controls.

Parameter Golf — Technique Explorer

Question

Under a fixed Parameter Golf compute budget, which training techniques can show a measurable signal early enough to rank — and which only look like noise until thousands of steps?

Context

Working catalog for Parameter Golf, grounded in experiment prioritization and timing research and the meta-stack / convergence notes in 2 - Source Material/Research/.

The durable research idea is signal timing, not a leaderboard of final BPB:

  • Short runs of late-signal techniques measure noise, not merit — burn a few hundred steps ranking early ideas first.
  • Community and paper stacks cluster into free wins (BigramHash, SmearGate), core capacity, efficiency (Muon, QK-Norm), depth (recurrence, partial RoPE), and representation bets (STP-lite, JEPA-lite) that rarely pay before long horizons.
  • Fixed wallclock or step budgets should sequence experiments by when an effect becomes distinguishable from noise.

Findings

  • Early signal (200–500 steps): SmearGate, BigramHash, exclusive self-attention (XSA), Muon, OrthoInit + LN scale, QK-Norm + Z-loss. Muon shows roughly 2× token efficiency over AdamW from the first steps.
  • Medium signal (500–2,000 steps): 3×MLP capacity, EMA weight averaging, attention-over-residuals variants, partial RoPE.
  • Late signal (2,000+ steps or post-training): depth recurrence (best recorded ~1.163 BPB, only after thousands of steps), STP-lite, JEPA-lite, late quantization-aware training.

Fourteen techniques total; the interactive filter re-executes that catalog in-browser.

Method

Techniques are tagged by signal timing so a fixed experiment budget can be sequenced: burn a few hundred steps ranking early ideas; reserve full-length runs for techniques that cannot show value sooner. Timing bands come from literature synthesis and local run experience, not from a single controlled factorial.

Limits

  • Timing bands are planning priors, not preregistered causal effects. A technique tagged “early” can still fail on a given stack.
  • Catalog BPB anecdotes (e.g. depth recurrence ~1.163) are historical run notes — the sealed competitive standings live on the Parameter Golf Run Leaderboard.
  • Interactive WASM notebook re-runs filter code; it does not retrain models.

Artifact

Fully interactive: Python via WebAssembly in the browser; the signal-timing filter re-runs code, not a canned view. Source notebook is public in pggolf-experiments; export pinned to its source commit.

Open notebook View source ↗

  • training
  • language-models
  • marimo