Notebook
Parameter Golf — Technique Explorer
An interactive catalog of training techniques for small language models, filterable by how early each one shows measurable signal.
Verdict Not applicable
- Published
- Jul 2026
- Verdict
- Not applicable
- Source commit
- 48faedeea7fe…
- Verification
- Verified
- Question
- Which signal-timing ideas are worth trying before spending more golf budget?
- Intent
- Turn scattered compression tricks into a budget-aware technique catalog.
- Method
- Organize sealed Parameter Golf runs by mechanism, cost, and observed leaderboard effect.
- Next test
- Promote only techniques that improve a fresh leaderboard run under the same null controls.
Parameter Golf — Technique Explorer
Question
Under a fixed Parameter Golf compute budget, which training techniques can show a measurable signal early enough to rank — and which only look like noise until thousands of steps?
Context
Working catalog for Parameter Golf, grounded in experiment prioritization and timing research and the meta-stack / convergence notes in 2 - Source Material/Research/.
The durable research idea is signal timing, not a leaderboard of final BPB:
- Short runs of late-signal techniques measure noise, not merit — burn a few hundred steps ranking early ideas first.
- Community and paper stacks cluster into free wins (BigramHash, SmearGate), core capacity, efficiency (Muon, QK-Norm), depth (recurrence, partial RoPE), and representation bets (STP-lite, JEPA-lite) that rarely pay before long horizons.
- Fixed wallclock or step budgets should sequence experiments by when an effect becomes distinguishable from noise.
Findings
- Early signal (200–500 steps): SmearGate, BigramHash, exclusive self-attention (XSA), Muon, OrthoInit + LN scale, QK-Norm + Z-loss. Muon shows roughly 2× token efficiency over AdamW from the first steps.
- Medium signal (500–2,000 steps): 3×MLP capacity, EMA weight averaging, attention-over-residuals variants, partial RoPE.
- Late signal (2,000+ steps or post-training): depth recurrence (best recorded ~1.163 BPB, only after thousands of steps), STP-lite, JEPA-lite, late quantization-aware training.
Fourteen techniques total; the interactive filter re-executes that catalog in-browser.
Method
Techniques are tagged by signal timing so a fixed experiment budget can be sequenced: burn a few hundred steps ranking early ideas; reserve full-length runs for techniques that cannot show value sooner. Timing bands come from literature synthesis and local run experience, not from a single controlled factorial.
Limits
- Timing bands are planning priors, not preregistered causal effects. A technique tagged “early” can still fail on a given stack.
- Catalog BPB anecdotes (e.g. depth recurrence ~1.163) are historical run notes — the sealed competitive standings live on the Parameter Golf Run Leaderboard.
- Interactive WASM notebook re-runs filter code; it does not retrain models.
Artifact
Fully interactive: Python via WebAssembly in the browser; the signal-timing filter re-runs code, not a canned view. Source notebook is public in pggolf-experiments; export pinned to its source commit.